Given the hurricane force winds, magnitude 9 earthquakes, hail, and occasional firestorms that will assault the
Earth's surface during the hour of the pole shift, where is the greatest safety? Going out to sea, especially out to
sea in a submarine, is often mentioned as a possibility. Water would buffer the force of an earthquake, and being
underwater would protect from hail and firestorms. Those with the funds set about to ensure they would have a
private submarine, hitting the news in 2007.
- Mega-rich Paying Top Price for Luxury Submarines
Jul 11, 2007
- The ocean floor is the final spending frontier for the world's richest people. Journeying to see
what's on the bottom aboard a personal submersible is a wretched excess guaranteed to trump the
average mogul's stable of vintage Bugattis or a $38 million round-trip ticket to the international
space station aboard a Russian rocket. Luxury-sub makers and salesmen from the Pacific Ocean to
the Persian Gulf say fantasy and secrecy are the foundations of this nautical niche industry built on
madcap multibillionaires. It isn't cheap to run silent and sleep deep. Jaubert's 10-passenger sub
costs $15 million. A gymnasium is optional. U.S. Submarines' midsize model is the $25 million
Seattle 1000, a three-story-tall vessel with five staterooms, five bathrooms, two kitchens, a gym, a
wine cellar and a 30-foot-long by 15-foot-wide observation portal. It has a range of 3,000 nautical
For those without a spare $15-25 million, seats on a refurbished Navy submarine are now available for a mere
$1 million a seat. This group, formed from former Naval personnel presumably privy to insider information,
makes no bones about blaming Planet X for the forthcoming problems.
- Where Will You be on December 21st 2012?
- The U.S. and governments across the globe have been frantically building massive underground
bunkers and "doomsday vaults", without giving the public any rational explanation for their mad
rush. President Obama just signed an Executive Order; the order forbids astronomers from
releasing information about "incoming objects" without government approval. As many of you
know, an object has entered our solar system and has begun to have an effect on the inner planets,
which is why our weather disasters and quakes of late, have been off the charts in frequency and
ferocity. This object is what's responsible for the sudden depletion of our magnetosphere, and has
already affected earth's spin. It is believed that once the earth firmly locks on to this object's
gravitational force, a "pole shift" will occur, causing massive crustal displacement.
Operation Aquarius is a team of highly trained naval officers who have used their connections, and
pooled their resources to purchase a decommissioned submarine, and we are presently working on
acquiring two more. All three will be specially refitted for the sole purpose of surviving the
Apocalypse. Because stored food, medical equipment and supplies are of such great concern, we
will only have room on each sub for twenty (20) non-crew passengers. The cost is one million
dollars ($1,000,000 U.S.) per seat. Military decommissioned submarines that are still sea-worthy
are not cheap, neither is the cost of refitting them to ensure they (and we) survive what's coming.
After December 21st 2012, money will have absolutely no value anyway.
What could go wrong? Lots, per the Zetas.
ZetaTalk Analysis 7/21/2007: When the ZetaTalk saga first emerged in 1995, there was often talk of
riding out the shift underwater in submarines, or on the water in a boat. Since earthquakes do not jolt
the water but instead create waves, and boats ride the waves, why not? Being out of the wind avoids the
problem of hurricane force winds doing damage to one's land based structure. This route avoids the
problem of bunkers in caves or underground collapsing, where the shifting ground can trap one in a
tomb. Indeed, those in submarines far out to sea are likely to find they do survive the jolts of the pole
shift, along with the hurricane force winds and occasional fire storm. Humans on land near volcanoes
must worry about being located within 100 miles from the eruptions and avoiding the ash that will blow
downwind afterwards. A sub can avoid this if the location is carefully chosen so as not to be positioned
over underwater volcanoes or vents where they could be cooked in the hot water.
Have the super rich then figured out a way to avoid being hurt during the pole shift? The problem comes
afterwards, as none can avoid the Aftertime! Such subs will certainly be swept a long way from their
starting point, and in unanticipated directions. In the low-lying cloud cover, volcanic gloom and constant
drizzle, there will be no visible stars to guide, and compasses will be useless in the magnetic turmoil. Any
anticipation that GPS satellites will be operational is fantasy as the satellites have already failed and
crashed to Earth. So unless the sub just happens to find itself close to a familiar shoreline, where it is
unlikely to survive the flood tides and sloshing of the shift, they will be lost. They may head out toward
the center of the ocean, or wander in circles for years, never finding land. But say they do find land, and
are anxious to replenish their supplies. How do you suppose they will be welcomed by the starving
survivors they find on land? And how would such submarine occupants parlay with these survivors? By
offering worthless paper money, or perhaps empty wine bottles?
A February 12, 2010 15:18 UTC images from the SOHO satellite showed, in a dramatic and undeniable
manner, that the SOHO images are being regularly edited to edit out evidence of Planet X in the inner solar
system. An animation on the Pole Shift ning shows this particularly well, as the editing has Venus jumping
backwards, and then subsequently back into position. Venus is moving to the left, off the field of view, at the
VIDEO: Blooper Animation
After such a dramatic blooper, you'd think that NASA would give it up, but they are still trying to edit the C3
images at that location! Here's another, from February 18, 2010 11:42 UTC.
And yet another from February 26, 2010 23:18 UTC. No question about it, an edit line!
Why are so many apparent bloopers happening these days? Could it have something to do with the apparent
passage of Jupiter behind the Sun? Jupiter is apparently moving behind the Sun in the SOHO images. I checked
for a recent passage of Saturn and it took 3 weeks between November 26, 2009 through December 9, 2009
and this passage of Jupiter seems to be pacing in a similar manner. All would appear as it should. But Jupiter is
an outer planet, taking many years for an orbit, and would certainly be out of place for an Earth in a stalled orbit
since December 2003. It's been 7 years! The constellations can be simulated as they are overhead all the time,
day or night, and can be seen when the globe is tipped to reduce the glare of the Sun, and even in a stalled orbit
they can appear only slightly offset from their approximate place and time as the Zetas have demonstrated, and
moving the Moon during an eclipse can easily effect apparent precision, and Venus can be pushed back and
forth within the cup, well in view of the satellites for an appearance of normalcy, and little Mercury is a
lightweight planet easily bullied by alien manipulation. But having Jupiter exactly opposite the Earth is hard to
fathom after a 7 year stalled orbit. In addition, the Earth has supposedly been pushed back to almost the end of
August position, and the calender date is now some 5 months different, at the end of February. Jupiter should be
behind us, not in front of us as we look at the Sun. So what is going on here that it appears on SOHO images?
The Zetas, as always, explained.
ZetaTalk Explanation 2/27/2010: The SOHO and Stereo satellite cameras were designed to take images of
the Sun - activity around and on the surface of the Sun such as solar flares, sunspots, and the occasional
comet rounding the Sun. It is incidental for these satellite cameras to be capturing the progress of the
other planets as they pass into or out of view, or to be capturing the stars in the background. Thus, great
precision and clarity are not required of the background, as the central character is the Sun. When the
Earth stalled in her orbit at the end of 2003, the establishment was taken by surprise, and thus had
already issued specifics on the anticipated comet trajectories for C/2001 Q4 and C/2002 T7. They were
out of place in early 2004, from where projected, but in placefor a stalled orbit. But the establishment,
desperate to conceal the reality of Planet X in the inner solar system, plotted to abort other such
accidental revelations. As it obvious from the many times SOHO has shown edit lines or planets lurching
about that the images are manipulated. This goes beyond air-brushing out the presence of Planet X,
which has lately become problematic for NASA as the tail is wafting about. Their manipulation includes
the placement of light bursts where the other planets should be, on schedule. This is certainly a simple
matter, and can be programmed to be included with the images before they arrive on Earth at the SOHO
repositories. The occasional edit line blooper shows the operation of such programs, as a computer
program cannot gaze at the overall and see slight shades differences as the human eye can do. Thus,
Jupiter is passing, on schedule, behind the Sun where in reality it is not there at all!
Odd checkmarks began appearing on the SOHO images within this past month. They are showing up on various
images - the C2 on 2/15/2010 at 00:54 UTC, the C3 on 2/19/2010 at 13:52 UTC and on 2/20/2010 at 01:42
UTC, and on Stereo Behind on 2/8/2010 at 12:17:19 UTC images. NASA certainly can't explain these away as
colliding asteroid, never before seen.
The Zetas explain that this is just another representation of Moon Swirls in the tail of Planet X.
ZetaTalk Explanation 2/20/2010: These are yet another example of Moon Swirl sightings, as is the String
of Pearls phenomena. The L shape, sometimes with addition lines coming from the central point of
juncture, is due to minor swirls stemming from a single large Moon. These swirls are within a charged
dust cloud, and when the charge differs, they attempt to stand away from each other, as static will make
your hair stand on end and separate. The tail of Planet X is composed of dozens of moons the size of the
Earth's Moon, much debris, and charged red dust. Depending upon the angle, sunlight can blaze off a
portion of the dust cloud around a Moon Swirl, so it looks like a spash of light with a drifing tail. Or it
can blaze off the individual moons in a swirl, each surrounding by its own dust cloud, so it appears as a
String of Pearls. Or under close inspection, the individual moons may be visible.
Pole Shift Ning
This is a blog, or message board, called the Earth Changes and Pole Shift ning, started only last August, 2009. It
has proved phenomenally successful in attracting members from around the world who take the current Earth
changes and possibility of a pending pole shift very, very seriously. The rising tide of Earthquakes and volcanic
activity, the twisting magnetosphere, the convoluted explanations from the establishment, survival tips and
solutions, and the difficulty of planning a survival camp when so many friends and family just want to brush off
talk of this nature. All this has this site abuzz with discussion. The ning has grown to some 464 members, though
some 3,000 unique visitors come through every day. Of the membership, 42 different countries are represented,
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Britain, Bulgaria,
Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Ireland,
Italy, Java, Korea, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mongolia, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand,
Norway, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Russia, Scotland, South
Africa, Sweden, Trinidad and Tobago, Ukraine, United States, Vietnam
You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly